NaNoWriMo, a not-quite novel breakthrough

Participant, but not winner. Maybe next year.

November draws to a close and I must haul myself out from The Zone and take a look at what I’ve achieved. Well, I’m not a winner. That 50,000 word count was a summit I couldn’t reach.

On the other hand, a month’s worth of wordcount has left me with the barebones of a novel draft coming in at just over 30,000 words. In addition, I’ve kept up with my daughter’s education, so she’s not entirely feral. Points for that. I’ve still got a marriage and in a little while I’m going to remind Steve of just that fact. Heck, the rest can wait.

"Do I smell a plot?"

I’ve done my best not to rewrite as I go. More points. I have written every day, and only indulged in a couple of funks – nothing a few beers didn’t fix. I’ve organised myself into something that resembles a routine. I should have done that years ago, but it still bears mentioning. Finally, I can now confidently categorise my story in three nifty words. Boiling 30,000 words down to a measly three might appear counter-productive, but what it means – to me – is that when I throw the murky bathwater out, I’ll still have the baby.

So, next time I’m asked “What are you writing?” I don’t have to waffle, I can answer: “I’m writing a Taoist Urban Fantasy”.

Story outline: know thyself, then kick-ass.

Now, I’m fairly confident that there’s very few outside the geeky parallel world in which I exist, who would understand how these few words enable me to envisage the essence of my novel in just the same way as a haiku might capture the concept of nature – and fewer still who’d care. The point is, it doesn’t matter if nobody else “gets it”, so long as I DO.

And I do. Those few words enable me to direct character, voice, plot and magic system into a coherent whole. Moreover, I’m looking forward to writing it. My dragon-story has finally been revealed, and now we can kick-ass together.

Knowing what your story is about, and knowing what your story is are two different things. It’s taken me a while to crack that concept, and it is something of a novel breakthrough. Thanks NaNo!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to NaNoWriMo, a not-quite novel breakthrough

  1. 30,000 words!! heavens, but the mind has trouble going past the planned strategy to remind Steve you still have a marriage.
    Merry Christmas

    Allen

  2. Stephen Henshaw says:

    Hi Lyn really looking forward to reading this (and your short stories with the kids …. actually forget the kids!!)
    x

    • Lyn says:

      Hey Steve, Then I’d better get cracking! I’m working on two short stories at the moment and aim to have at least one more up before end-January. Then it’s back to the novel. I needed a break from it after November: I was beginning to mutter in monotone and break into laughter at unexpected and inappropriate moments. (You know, acting like me, but stranger.) :-) Thanks for the look-in, mate. You’ve made my day. Cheers, Lyn.

  3. Bob Stewart says:

    My recently published ebook, Alias Thomas A. Katt, was an ebook. I came in at 55,000 words then spent the better part of a year rewriting and expanding to more than 80,000 words.
    Good luck with your project. Bob

    PS My wife and I love the Caribbean but we’ve only visited by plane and cruise ship

    • Lyn says:

      Hi Bob, it’s so nice to meet a fellow-NaNoWriMo and Indie writer. Kudos to you for getting your book out. A year for a polished product seems to be the benchmark .. .and somewhere in there, we have to have a life too! :-) I love the concept of “Thomas Katt” and look forward to reading it (my Kindle to-read list is getting hefty but I prioritize fellow indies). Thanks for dropping by the blog, and taking the time to leave a comment and introduce yourself. Cheers, Lyn.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>